July 23, 2004

Vanity Blogging

I often find myself going through my own old blog posts and re-reading them. Occasionally, I find mistakes to fix, or think of a better way to word something, or realize I now have additional insights to add. After all, I do use this blog partially as a way to organize my thoughts (as I mentioned earlier), so it needs to be a living document. And indeed, sometimes it does remind me of something I’d forgotten, or re-clarifies a thought that had become hazy.

But generally, I don’t think this is the real reason I read my own stuff (and this is not the reason it’s been almost a whole week since my last post — I’ll explain that some other time). While I’ll occasionally cringe at something I wrote (and quickly fix whatever’s wrong with it), most of the time I’m generally pretty satisfied with what I’d written, if not outright proud. So I generally get a good amount of enjoyment from the experience.

This is not to say that I spend a lot of time reading my own stuff, especially since I’m a lot more likely to gain insights from reading other people’s stuff. But I wonder if this is a common practice among other bloggers, or whether I’m just unusually vain?

Well if I am, so be it.

On a side note, I’ve made some significant revisions/enhancements to my post, The Message, Not the Messenger. I consider it one of my better works, so I think it’s worth checking out, if my vain self does say so myself.

July 23, 2004 07:52 PM in Blogging | Permalink
Trackback
Sorry, Trackback pings are disabled for now. Drop me an e-mail and I'll manually update the page to link back to you.
Blogging Is Pure Vanity: Profile Of A Vain Blogger.
Weblog: you've been HAACKED
Excerpt: TITLE: Blogging Is Pure Vanity: Profile Of A Vain Blogger. URL: http://haacked.com/archive/2004/10/08/1322.aspx IP: 66.102.135.210 BLOG NAME: you've been HAACKED DATE: 10/08/2004 10:56:44 AM
Tracked: October 8, 2004 10:56 AM
Comments

I don’t know if I’d call it vanity blogging. I also use my blog to organize my thoughts and most importantly to keep a running reference of things I’m doing or interested in. So, yes, I also go back and read posts I’ve made, I don’t do that much if any real writing like you do, but I like to go back and re-read some of the posts and links.

Also making corrections here and there. Sometimes I’m amazed by the very large typos, misspellings or just general gibberish that I find.

Also making corrections here and there. Sometimes I’m amazed by the very large typos, mispellings or just general giberish that I find.

Posted by mike at 07/24/04, 09:39 AM (link)

LOL! Yeah, but you’ve got company. What’s really amazing is the number of really glaring typos I often find in some of the big blogs, including those of published writers like Yglesias or Drezner. I think it’s just what happens when you have a publishing medium that seems to value immediacy more than accuracy or completeness — not to mention a publishing process that cuts editors out of the loop. I wonder if there might eventually develop a market for rapid on-line proofreaders? But I think I’ll develop that thought into a blog post sometime.

Anyway, good to know I’m not crazy in regards to reading my own work. :)

Posted by fling93 at 07/26/04, 12:45 PM (link)