February 27, 2004
Richard Perle Resigns
Hmm, nobody else seems to have picked up on this yet, but Richard Perle has resigned:
Richard Perle, a prominent adviser to the Bush administration known for his hawkish views on Iraq and other national security matters, has resigned from the Defense Policy Board, saying he wanted to avoid being a lightning rod for criticism of the administration during a presidential election year.
Perle submitted his resignation from the board — a bipartisan advisory group with no decision-making power — in a Feb. 18 letter to Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld.
“We are now approaching a long presidential election campaign, in the course of which issues on which I have strong views will be widely discussed and debated,” Perle wrote. “I would not wish those views to be attributed to you or the president at any time, and especially not during a presidential campaign.”
A Pentagon spokesman confirmed the resignation and said Rumsfeld has accepted it, thanking Perle for his long service on the board, which spanned 17 years. The resignation was first reported late yesterday by Knight Ridder.
The full text of his resignation letter is available here:
…
Since there is bound to be speculation about my departure from the DPB, I thought I would put what I said to you in writing.
Despite heated disclaimers, my membership on the defense policy board has led many people to see my articles, books and television appearances to associate my views with those of the administration or the Department of Defense. This results partly from a misunderstanding about the role and nature of the Defense Policy Board, exacerbated by the controversy surrounding policies I have advocated as a private citizen. A television viewer or newspaper reader, accustomed to zoning boards, school boards and appeal boards, is likely to think that the Defense Policy Board actually makes decisions, and that a member of it must be in a position to speak authoritatively about administration policy. The fact that the Defense Policy Board is not a decision making body but is simply a forum enabling the Secretary of Defense to hear a variety of opinions and observations (often opposed to one another) is simply not understood by the general public
We are now approaching a long presidential election campaign, in the course of which issues on which I have strong views will be widely discussed and debated. I would not wish those views to be attributed to you or the President at any time, and especially not during a presidential campaign. This is particularly true now since I have just published a book that calls for far reaching reform of government departments responsible for combating terrorism. Many of the ideas in that book are controversial and I wish to be free to argue them without those views or my arguments getting caught up in the campaign.
…
Wow. Am I the only one shocked by this? I mean, wasn’t Bush planning to run as a “war president”? Seems kind of an odd time to be distancing yourself from the biggest hawks on your staff (or vice versa, but I can’t imagine this really being Perle’s idea or decision). So will Paul Wolfowitz be next? And why isn’t this bigger news? This happened a week ago!
February 27, 2004 01:31 AM in Foreign Affairs, Politics | PermalinkWeblog: Brayden King
Excerpt: Yay! Richard Perle resigned from his position in the Bush administration. Does that mean our White House will be free of weird ideological radicalism during future discussions of defense policy? Um, no. You’d have to fire the president to rid our...
Tracked: February 27, 2004 02:08 PM
That does seem rather odd that so few bloggers and mainstream journalists are talking about this. Does this portend any other changes in the White House? Or is Perle just quitting so he can write more stupid-ass books?
Posted by brayden at 02/27/04, 07:52 AM (link)I don’t think the blogosphere has picked up on it yet — not even the anti-war bloggers that called for Perle’s resignation several months ago. Note, this wasn’t something I found in an RSS feed. My wife found it buried in the back of the paper. Sounds like something the administration doesn’t want to draw attention to, so spread the word!
Personally, I don’t think Perle quit on his own. Why quit a job where you have more influence than Colin Powell? And if Perle really didn’t want to hurt the administration by association, why didn’t he just say he quit to write books or for personal reasons? Just seems like Karl Rove must have told Bush to distance himself from the war.
Posted by fling93 at 02/27/04, 09:40 AM (link)